Status Report on Ontario's Electricity Reforms

Tom Adams
Presentation to CAMPUT 2001
June 19, 2001

Successes So Far

  • Reasonably solid legislative foundation
  • Slow but solid progress commissioning a good physical wholesale market: on track for November
  • Promotion of competition and price protection through the Market Power Mitigation Agreement (MPMA)
  • Some (albeit shallow) “decontrol” achieved

Challenge: Rising publicly-backed debt/direct taxpayer losses

  • Ontario Electricity Financial Corp.’s (OEFC) Year One Cash Loss = $834 m (new debt) + $235 m (taxpayers)
  • OEFC’s Year Two Cash Loss = ? (debt) + $54 m (taxpayers)
  • Contradicts "White Paper" promise

Challenge: Politically secured industrial discounts

  • Weakens financial and physical hedging markets (AKA competition)
  • Exacerbates price volatility (fewer controllable loads)
  • Higher publicly-backed debt (OPG pays subsidies out of foregone dividends)
  • Contradicts Bill 35

Challenge: Minimal/risky generation investment

  • Only significant post-Bill 35 new generation investment (1000s MW on ice):
      Trans Alta’s Sarnia cogen (440 MW new)
  • Generation investment emphasizes putting nuclear eggs back in the basket:
      OPG/Taxpayers restart Pickering A (2040 MW for $1.3 B)
      Bruce Power’s Bruce restart 3&4 (1538 MW)

Challenge: Impediments to institutional independence

  • Direct government intervention at OEB:
      net load billing for T service, Bill 100, the "Directive", Regulation 00/365 (re. gas), Regulation 01/61
  • OEB compensation regime like a government department rather than an independent agency (eg. OSC)
  • IMO directors not appointed by members

Challenge: Higher consumer prices for regulated services

  • Distribution rates up about 70% not including Payments in Lieu of taxes (PILS)
  • Accelerated Debt Reduction Charge (DRC) leads to double recovery until market opens
  • Rising publicly-backed debt has caused DRC growth and taxpayer hit – more coming
  • Contradicts "White Paper" commitments

Challenge: Leadership gaps on market opening and customer education

  • No firm market opening date
  • No resolution to the historic NUG issue
  • Public is poorly informed/misinformed
      re. DRC, MPMA rebates, unbundling, distribution rate increases, PILS
  • OEFC’s debt “reduction” plan secret
  • Some (large and small) LDCs behind schedule on market readiness
This entry was posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment