Ontario moves to fine-tune power sector legislation

Paul Vieira
National Post
December 12, 2002

More Ontario residents will qualify for a price cap on the electricity they consume after the provincial government introduced further changes yesterday to legislation governing the power sector.

The new measures will see the number of people eligible for the capped rate expanded from households and farmers to people who live in condominiums and apartment buildings, businesses with less than 50 employees and a recognized charitable institution.

The regulations are aimed at supplementing Bill 210, which basically abandons the province’s attempt to open its power market to competition after electricity prices soared this past summer. Its chief tenet is that the price of power paid by consumers will be capped at 4.3 cents a kilowatt hour (KwH) until 2006, at the earliest. The province will step in and cover the cost if the market price for power exceeds 4.3 cents KwH.

Also, uplift charges – a 0.62 cents KwH levy charged to cover the cost of importing power – will be frozen. The uplift charge soared during certain days in the summer, to as high as 25 cents KwH, due to the need to import electricity from neighbouring provinces and states to meet record demand.

Critics say these two moves will add to the $21-billion hydro-related debt. "They are all in the spirit of Bill 210, and they dig the hole a little deeper," said Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe and a critic of the government’s handling of Ontario’s power sector. "This is central planning, without a plan."

The measures, filed with the provincial registrar, also makes the Independent Electricity Market Operator more accountable to the provincial government. The province wants the IMO – whose job it is to balance supply and demand across the transmission grid and ensure generators are paid for the electricity they produce – to seek prior approval from the Minister of Energy for any proposed changes to the structure of the power market.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Energy Probe's presentation to Ontario's electricity billing review

December 12, 2002

  In early October 2002, Ontario Premier Ernie Eves made comments criticizing the Ontario Energy Board and electricity bills, ordering a review of rates. The review is being conducted by Deloitte Consulting. Concerned that rate issues are best handled through independent regulatory processes and not through politically-driven processes, Energy Probe participated in the review process with some reluctance. Attached are speaking notes for Energy Probe’s presentation to Deloitte Consulting.

Energy Probe Presentation

Electricity Billing Review

To: Salvatore Badali, George O’Neill, Deloitte Consulting

Presenter: Tom Adams, Energy Probe

*****

Overarching principles of rate making:

• "User pays" and cost based;
• Independently adjudicated ratemaking;
• Unbundling enhances transparency and accountability;
• LDCs should be as purely "flow through" as possible;
• Respecting the wisdom built up over 100 years of utility rate-making.

Energy Probe’s recommended enhancements to electricity bills:

• Common format (while leaving opportunities for LDCs to add additional information, promotional messages, or explanation);
• Common use of terms (i.e., a common name for items like the Wholesale Market Services Charge to ease customer education);
• Common cost-based ratio for customer charges (so that, while customer charges might vary depending on differences in LDC cost, customers would have common and consistent explanations for the charges across the province);
• Increase customer charges or fixed monthly connection fees while making corresponding cuts to volumetric delivery charges (makes rates more closely match cost, lowers utility risk and therefore the utility’s cost of capital);
• Customer should have an option to select "minimal billing information" (perhaps only usage and the bundled charge);
• Increase capacity charges for capacity related costs, whether coincident or non-coincident, while making corresponding cuts to volumetric delivery charges (enhances the opportunities for customers to benefit from interval metering, makes rates more closely match cost, lowers utility risk and therefore the cost of capital).

Retrograde steps to avoid:

• Eliminate customer charges (would increase rates and increase cross-subsidies among consumers within customer classes);
• Eliminate unbundling of bill determinants (would reduce transparency and accountability);
• Enforce vanilla bills (would reduce efficiency by eliminating opportunities for low-cost communication from LDCs to consumers).


NEWS RELEASE

2 December, 2002

EVES GOVERNMENT LAUNCHES INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF HYDRO CHARGES

Queen’s Park — The Ernie Eves government is launching a review of all the items on the electricity bills of families, small businesses and farmers across Ontario. As part of the government’s Action Plan to Lower Your Hydro Bill, Energy Minister John Baird today appointed Sal Badali, FCA, to carry out the review and make recommendations.

"It’s important to review how these charges on electricity bills are calculated and ensure they are fair and reasonable," said Baird. "Families, small business owners and farmers need to know what they are paying is appropriate and clear, and I believe Mr. Badali will help us in this effort."

Badali is a business advisor with Deloitte Consulting in Toronto. He is an experienced business advisor with a strong financial background, holding an MBA from York University and a CA from the Ontario Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Badali will review the way the charges are calculated and determine if the items are fair and clear, including the charges imposed by the Independent Electricity Market Operator and the fixed monthly customer charge imposed by local distribution companies. He will also be making recommendations on a standard, province-wide electricity bill that consumers can easily understand.

Badali will make a progress report to Minister Baird within 30 days.

"People have told me how difficult it is to figure out the different charges on their hydro bills and I, for one, agree, said Baird. "Bills vary from local utility to local utility and we must take immediate action to determine common terms that are presented in a simple straightforward manner."


For consumer information call:
1-888-668-4636

Media Contacts:

Dan Miles
Minister’s Office
(416) 327-3373
(416) 330-1731 (pager)

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Eves donor cashed in on power deal

Paul McKay
Ottawa Citizen
December 13, 2002

The largest corporate donor to Premier Ernie Eves’ leadership campaign bought the first privatized Ontario Hydro plants eight weeks after his March victory, then enjoyed soaring revenues when Ontarians were hit with the highest power rates in history.

Last summer, the private power company drained consumer pocketbooks – and a watershed – in the bargain.

Brascan, an $11-billion conglomerate, donated $150,000 to Eves’ leadership bid through six corporate arms – Brascan Corp., Brascade Resources Inc., Trilon Financial Corporation, Noranda, Great Lakes Power Inc., and Brookfield Properties Corp.

Each of the six Brascan affiliates donated $25,000, according to financial statements filed to Elections Ontario. The next largest corporate donation was $45,434.

Brascan vice-president Katherine Vyse declined to discuss details of the $150,000 donation, saying: "Our comment is that we support the communities in which we operate charitably, culturally and politically, and Ontario is one of them."

The deal to buy the hydro plants was cemented while the Tory leadership contest was in the final stretch, though there is no indication that the sale was linked in any way to Brascan’s donation. Four hydroelectric stations on the Mississagi River, northeast of Sault Ste. Marie, were put on the block by publicly owned Ontario Power Generation (OPG).

The sale was spearheaded by OPG chairman William Farlinger, a former fundraiser and chief election strategist for the Ontario Tories. Farlinger had advocated the sale of Ontario Hydro assets prior to Mike Harris’s re-election in 1999, and during the period Eves was finance minister.

Eves became Tory leader on March 23 after raising $2.8 million in donations for his $3-million campaign. On May 1, Ontario’s experiment in power deregulation began.

It created a new market to buy and sell power based on supply and demand. Because OPG owned almost 80 per cent of power production in Ontario, its average revenues on power sold in Ontario were capped at 3.8 cents per kilowatt hour, and OPG was ordered to gradually sell off assets to reduce its monopoly position.

Under the plan, private power producers in Ontario and utilities in surrounding regions were allowed to sell to any customer in the province at any price, or export power if they chose. In effect, they could compete for power demand OPG could not supply.

On May 17, less than three weeks after Ontario’s deregulated market opened, OPG and a Brascan subsidiary closed their deal. Great Lakes Hydro Income Fund paid OPG $342 million for the four hydro plants, with Brascan providing $150 million in bridge financing. Another Brascan subsidiary, Great Lakes Power, operationally merged the hydro plants with others it owned in the Algoma region.

Days later, a record hot, muggy summer began. It lasted into late September, causing power demand to soar to an all-time high. By July, peak power prices had climbed to 47 cents per kilowatt hour, compared to the average of 5.2 cents. In September, the peak price spiked up to $1.03 per kilowatt hour.

With nine OPG nuclear reactors either mothballed or out of service for extensive overhauls, the province was forced to import record amounts of emergency power to avoid blackouts. Much of it came from U.S. coal plants.

That left Great Lakes Power free to sell power into the Ontario grid at premium prices – from four hydro plants that had just been transferred from public ownership.

The plants were especially valuable because they had very low operating costs, but could provide up to 488 megawatts of output timed to coincide with peak power demand, thus obtaining premium prices for all power produced. By storing water behind dams, then running the turbines when demand and prices were highest, Brascan could in effect use the river as a cash machine.

"Those plants put Brascan in a very special situation," says Tom Adams, a power industry analyst with the watchdog group Energy Probe. "They are the only non-OPG producer positioned to set power prices at times of peak demand in Ontario. They can hold power back, let the price climb, then let ‘er rip."

In doing just that, Great Lakes Power drained the upper Mississagi watershed – to the point that it virtually emptied a cottager’s recreational haven and forced tourist lodges and outfitters to temporarily close.

"It was not a pretty sight," says Mike Brown, the Liberal MPP for Algoma-Manitoulin. "There were beaches where water used to be, and fish trapped in small pools. Rocky Island Lake turned into a desert. Cottagers on Tunnel Lake went to bed and woke up the next morning to see their boats beached, sometimes hundreds of feet from shore.

"The government knew those plants would be a profit-making machine when they sold them. But there was no watershed management plan. There’s no question the public paid a huge premium for the power that was sold last summer."

Great Lakes Power operations manager Andy McPhee said the hydro plants abided by all legal requirements, and provided much-needed power to the Ontario grid.

"We sold power when Ontario needed it most," said McPhee. "We were paid the same amount of money as any other generator was paid for electricity during that time. Next summer, we will again be operating our system within the legal limits, as we did this past year.

"We are working with local stakeholders to understand their concerns and consider their interests in our operations. But if energy conditions are again tight next summer, then we may need to draw down the reservoirs again to help meet the needs of Ontario."

McPhee declined to say how much power his company sold during the summer period, and what price the Brascan affiliates received for it. He said Great Lakes Power sold all the power from the four hydro plants into the Ontario grid, and achieved the "market clearing price" for electricity sales. That is the highest price paid hourly or in five-minute increments.

This fall, the Great Lakes Power Income Fund reported a 42- per-cent revenue increase over the same period a year ago. (Some of this increase is due to revenues from new power plants not in the company asset portfolio the previous year.)

Brascan asserts it is one of the lowest cost producers of power in North America. OPG hydro-electric plants typically produce power for less than two cents per kilowatt hour.

An OPG spokesman said the Brascan sale followed a bid selection process that was reviewed by financial adviser Merrill Lynch and analysts at the provincial agency, Superbuild. He would not identify the number of bidders for the Mississagi hydro plant package.

"That is a confidential pro-cess. But as the sole shareholder, the (Ontario) government has Superbuild review all OPG de-control proposals (asset sales) to ensure that fair value is being obtained."

He said OPG reported only a $99-million pre-tax gain on the Brascan sale because that was the difference between its book value and the sale price of $342 million.

There is no evidence Brascan used improper influence to obtain the OPG assets. But there are questions about how the sale proceeds were spent by OPG.

"The funds from that sale were almost certainly consumed by OPG’s capital program, because we know they didn’t pay dividends or pay down its debt," says Adams of Energy Probe. "That means we liquidated those hydroelectric assets for the benefit of the black hole (costly reactor repairs) of Pickering A."

A spokesman for Eves said the Brascan donation of $150,000 was routine, and the OPG sale to Brascan was government-approved and completed without his involvement.

"A number of corporations have made donations to Eves and his campaigns, and corporations make donations of this kind to politicians of all stripes," says the premier’s press secretary, Derek Tupling. "The premier had no involvement whatsoever in this deal because this deal was completed before he was elected premier."

"When the Conservatives privatized those four plants, they gave no thought to the water flow and watershed management issues," counters NDP environment critic Marilyn Churley.

"What is really shocking is the greed. Ernie Eves does not give a darn because that gouging was done by a company that helped finance his leadership campaign."

The wheeling and dealing that occurred last summer might become a routine feature of Ontario’s future power system.

Government company registration records show that OPG has prepared to privatize other power plants, including those on the Ottawa, St. Lawrence and Madawaska rivers in Eastern Ontario. On a single day in March 1999, OPG created 31 legal subsidiaries similar to the four-plant package sold to Brascan. They comprise all the former Ontario Hydro hydro, nuclear and fossil fuel plants.

One nuclear package, OPG Bruce B Inc., has been leased to a consortium 83-per-cent owned by a private British company now facing bankruptcy. Several OPG coal plants have been put on the sales block, with no buyers to date.

The hydro asset packages include OPG Ottawa River Inc., OPG Madawaska Inc., OPG Niagara Inc., OPG St. Lawrence Inc. – and all the other hydro plants the former Ontario Hydro built over nearly a century.

The provincially owned sister company to OPG, Hydro One, has set up 13 separate companies in preparation for the privatization of its transmission and related assets. This occurred under the direction of former Hydro One CEO Eleanor Clitheroe, who was fired in July after allegations she racked up unauthorized expenses for yacht sponsorships, limo services and house renovations. She has denied all allegations, and filed civil lawsuits against Hydro One for wrongful dismissal and slander.

While she was the CEO of Hydro One, Clitheroe helped solicit corporate donations for Eves’ leadership bid. Her husband, Randy Bell, donated $10,000 to the Eves leadership bid.

Another Hydro One executive, Rod Taylor, donated $5,000 to Eves’ campaign, according to Elections Ontario filings. Brascan also donated $20,000 to the leadership bid of current health minister Tony Clement, while another Brascan affiliate donated $3,000 to the campaign of Education Minister Elizabeth Witmer.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Critics zap new electricity rules

John Spears
Toronto Star
December 13, 2002

New rules for Ontario’s electricity system will put the public purse at risk if the province needs to buy expensive imported power in the future, according to critics.

But the province says that with new generators coming on stream, the province isn’t likely to face the same need for imported power that currently exists – a need that cost about $200 million to fill this summer and fall.

The province has introduced new regulations for the power market to complement legislation passed this week.

Local utilities are currently stuck with much of the bill for the expensive imports. They charge their customers a regular fee throughout the year to pay for high-priced emergency imports, but this year the fee charged hasn’t come close to covering the actual cost.

Large power users who participate directly in the wholesale market – there are about 100 in the province – also pay directly for the imports through a surcharge tacked on to the Ontario market price of power.

At times, the surcharges have exceeded the Ontario market price by four or five times.

The new rules appear to eliminate the surcharge, but the power will still have to be paid for.

"Someone else is picking up the tab," said Charlie Macaluso, chief executive of the Electricity Distributors Association. "It looks like the OEFC (Ontario Electricity Financial Corp)."

The OEFC holds the debt left by the former Ontario Hydro before it was broken up. The crucial part of the debt is the so-called "stranded debt" – currently $20.1 billion – that’s not offset by assets.

The stranded debt has been rising, despite the introduction 18 months ago of a 0.7-cent per kilowatt hour debt retirement charge on customers’ electricity bills.

Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe, says the new regime makes no financial sense. "The result of these changes is from now on the price of power will be financed by borrowing," he said. That’s at odds with the user-pay principle that is supposed to guide the power market.

It also threatens to add debt to the books of the OEFC, which is backstopped by taxpayers.

Dan Miles, a spokesperson for Energy Minister John Baird, said the fears are unfounded.

He said new generators will be coming on stream in Ontario during the next year, so there will be less need for the high-priced emergency imports that were needed to keep Ontario’s lights on last summer.

They include the first unit of the much-delayed Pickering A nuclear station, which is currently laid up; two laid-up units at the Bruce A nuclear station; and another gas-powered unit.

The province has been wrong predicting supply adequacy before. Former energy minister Chris Stockwell said earlier this year: "We have an adequate supply of power. What Pickering does do is give us an over-supply. With the over-supply, it will drive down the cost of energy."

In fact, Pickering still hasn’t returned to service – it’s not due before next June – and the province did run short of power.

Miles said this time there really will be enough power to prevent the need for buying costly emergency imports.

"We’ve had a good, hard look and we believe over the course of the long term, it’s not going to result in a deficit situation," he said. "It’s going to pay for itself."

Another wrinkle in the new regulations is a revised definition of what constitutes a small power user, which will benefit from the new price cap of 4.3 cents a kilowatt hour.

Originally, a small user was one that used less than a set amount of power – information utilities already have on hand. Now, a new definition has been added: Small users include firms with 50 employees or fewer, no matter how much power they use.

Macaluso said local utilities have no idea how many employees their customers have, nor how they can collect that information in order to start billing them appropriately as of Dec. 1.

Miles said discussions are under way to sort out the problem.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Study begins on waterfront power plant

Melissa Leong
Toronto Star
December 20, 2002

Ontario Power Generation is partnering with Calgary-based TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. to study the viability of building a fossil-fuel power plant on Toronto’s waterfront.

The limited partnership, called Portlands Energy Centre L.P., or PEC, will immediately begin environmental and economic studies for the proposed 550 megawatt natural gas power-generation facility.

The plant would be located on part of the former R.L. Hearn Generating Station, which is owned by Ontario Power Generation, or OPG.

"The additional 550 megawatts of capacity could help improve the security and supply of electricity to meet the growing electricity needs of downtown Toronto," OPG president and chief executive officer Ron Osborne said in a statement. The province owns OPG.

Infrastructure already exists on the site, including gas lines, a discharge channel and a switch yard, TransCanada spokesperson Hejdi Feck said.

"We’d cut down on some of the environmental effects of construction."

With a local facility, there’s no need to build the power lines to deliver the power to the downtown core, she added.

Yesterday’s announcement comes more than a month after Ontario Energy Minister John Baird called for the acceleration of the assessment of the site.

Baird outlined a number of steps — including tax breaks to encourage private sector investment — to ensure the province didn’t face another summer of power shortages and skyrocketing prices.

In a news release, Baird said he was "encouraged" to see the beginning of the assessment process. The companies, which each own half of the Portlands Energy Centre partnership, said they signed a letter of intent to sell steam to Enwave District Energy Ltd.

Enwave, partly owned by the City of Toronto, provides steam heat to several downtown office buildings. The deal with PEC would allow Enwave to expand.

Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe, said the Enwave deal has great upside.

"By generating electricity and using the waste heat to supply heat to downtown buildings, it would translate into significant reduction to environmental emissions," Adams said.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

U.K. firm sells Bruce stake

Paul Waldie
Globe and Mail
December 24, 2002

British Energy PLC is selling its 82-per-cent stake in Bruce Power LP to a group of Canadian businesses for $950-million, but a forecast shows the deal still won’t ease Ontario’s energy supply problems.

Under the sale, TransCanada PipeLines Ltd., Cameco Corp. and a unit of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board (OMERS) will become the new majority owners of Bruce. The three will each own 31.6 per cent of Bruce, while two unions will own 5.2 per cent.

Calgary-based TransCanada and OMERS are each paying $376-million for their stakes. Saskatoon-based Cameco, which currently owns 15 per cent of Bruce, is paying $198-million for the additional 16.6-per-cent ownership. All three will also pay an equal share of $225-million in lease payments that Bruce owes Ontario Power Generation Corp., which leased eight nuclear reactors to Bruce for 18 years.

Duncan Hawthorne, Bruce Power’s chief executive officer, who is also a director of BE, said he will remain with the company along with other senior managers. Five Bruce managers, including Mr. Hawthorne, came from BE.

Bruce Power operates eight nuclear reactors and is Ontario’s largest private sector power generator (the eight reactors can supply 20 per cent of the province’s power). The company’s future was thrown into doubt this summer when BE ran into financial trouble. Bruce Power, which had a $121-million operating profit last year, is considered BE’s best asset.

Negotiations between the three major partners nearly collapsed last month when Ontario Premier Ernie Eves froze electricity prices. The companies were concerned about the government’s intervention. However, they would not say yesterday how much Mr. Eves’ announcement affected the final purchase price.

Mr. Hawthorne and the new owners said the sale means the company will be able to restart four idle reactors by this summer as planned. Bruce is spending $400-million refurbishing the reactors, which have been shut down since the late 1990s. Last week, staff of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission recommended that the restart be delayed until the company’s ownership was resolved.

Under the sale agreement, if at least one of the reactors is not on-line by June 15, 2003, Bruce Power must pay a $20-million penalty.

"With the signing of the agreement, I can say that the restart of the reactors is on track," said Bernard Michel, Cameco’s CEO.

However, the laid-up reactors are expected to operate at 68-per-cent capacity when they restart. The four reactors currently operating run at over 80-per-cent capacity.

Even if the reactors come on-line as scheduled, Ontario faces a tight power supply next year, according to a report released yesterday by the province’s Independent Electricity Market Operator.

The province will still be required to buy power next summer if weather is extreme, the report said, adding that transmission lines may not be adequate to support major power purchases from outside Ontario. If the Bruce reactors and other expected nuclear supplies do not come on-line, the province could face a "risk of insufficient power," the report said.

"That is engineering jargon for rolling blackouts," said Tom Adams Energy Probe, a Toronto-based environmental group. "The report describes Ontario as desperately short of power. Neighbouring utilities are in a position to pick the pockets of taxpayers."

Mr. Adams said the Bruce reactors might come on-line as scheduled, but it will take months for them to operate at normal capacity. He also said the new owners have no experience running nuclear reactors.

Hal Kvisle, TransCanada’s chief executive officer, acknowledged his company’s lack of experience with nuclear power.

"While I recognize that some may be apprehensive about nuclear power, let me assure you that TransCanada is not getting into the business of operating nuclear facilities. We are investing with strong partners in an excellent facility operated by a proven and capable team."

He added that the purchase fits within the company’s strategy to expand its generation holdings. TransCanada’s share price closed up 40 cents at $22.87 on the Toronto Stock Exchange yesterday.

However, rating agency Standard & Poor’s put TransCanada on credit watch with "negative" implications yesterday in part because of concerns about the deal. The company said it plans to provide more information to the agency to ease its concerns.

Karen Taylor, an analyst at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., estimated the deal will add 1 cent to TransCanada’s earnings per share next year and up to 10 cents in 2004.

"We believe that the investment in Bruce has a higher risk profile than TransCanada’s existing portfolio of businesses," she said in a report yesterday.

Cameco expects its stake in Bruce Power to contribute between 90 cents and $1 a share in earnings next year and in 2004. The company’s shares closed up $1.46 at $38.99 on the TSX yesterday.

Dale Richmond, head of OMERS, said the pension fund viewed Bruce Power as a stable, long-term investment.

"We invest to pay pensions, so we have patient capital and we want a good, steady, predictable long-term return, which many of these large infrastructure projects provide," he said.

Highlights of the deal

Consortium of Cameco Corp. TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. and a unit of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board pay $950-million for Bruce Power.

Each of the three partners will own 31.6 per cent; the remaining 5.2 per cent will be owned by two unions.

Consortium members will also pay $225-million to cover lease payments owed by Bruce Power to Ontario Power Generation.

If at least one Bruce A unit has not restarted by June 15, 2003, the new owners must pay an additional $20-million.

Management of Bruce Power will remain, including chief executive Duncan Hawthorne who is a director of British Energy.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Enbridge disputes board's decision

John Spears
Toronto Star
January 9, 2003

Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. has asked the Ontario Energy Board to reconsider a decision last month in which the board questioned whether Enbridge still has the in-house expertise to run gas pipelines.

Enbridge Gas Distribution has 1.5 million customers in Ontario, and serves most of Greater Toronto east of Oakville.

The company has been aggressively outsourcing operations, including gas purchasing, pipeline operating control and customer service – in many cases to its parent, Enbridge Inc., or to other Enbridge affiliates.

Several customer groups told the energy board that the outsourcing is so extensive that Enbridge Gas Distribution may soon become a "virtual utility." The board observed it is "unclear" whether the company still has "all the assets, including expertise" to run gas pipelines.

The customers questioned whether the deals Enbridge Gas Distribution struck with its affiliates were at competitive market prices. They suggested the contracts might benefit Enbridge Inc. shareholders, at the expense of Enbridge Gas Distribution ratepayers.

The board listened with a sympathetic ear.

While Enbridge argued there is "no evidence that outsourcing will harm ratepayers," the board said that’s not good enough.

"Enbridge must demonstrate not only that the arrangements will not harm ratepayers, but also that there will be a significant and tangible benefit to ratepayers," it ruled, ordering the company to show such evidence the next time its rates are reviewed.

Enbridge takes issue with that.

"The board erred in its determination that Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.’s outsourcing must provide a benefit to ratepayers," the company argues.

The board "violated the fairness principle in utility ratemaking, which requires the balancing of the interests of the utility, the shareholder and the consumer."

The decision, it contends, will make it harder for Enbridge to raise capital, and will make it more difficult to present future cases to the energy board.

The energy board itself is in flux. No permanent replacement has been named for ex-chair Floyd Laughren, who resigned last fall, and the provincial government is conducting a review of the board’s mandate.

Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe, said the case will test the board’s mettle.

"What’s at stake here is the ability of the regulator to ensure that utility outsourcing doesn’t undermine the ability of the regulator to protect the public interest," he said in an interview.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Power rate cap likely to cost taxpayers plenty

Murray Campbell
Globe and Mail
January 11, 2003

It’s becoming clear how much money the Ontario government will have to spend to bribe voters by ending the province’s brief flirtation with an open electricity market and capping power rates.

The province’s 86 local electrical utilities reported this week that they lost $110-million in December because they had to buy electricity on the volatile wholesale market while selling it at the government’s mandated retail rate of 4.3 cents a kilowatt-hour.

The local utilities will be reimbursed for this cost next week by the Independent Electricity Market Operator, the organization that administers Ontario’s great energy experiment. The IMO, with no great resources of its own, will then go for repayment to the Ontario Electricity Financial Corp., which may have to pile it onto the debt that was built up by the old Ontario Hydro and is being serviced by the same taxpayers happy to receive low-cost power.

In the next few months, the utilities will report further about how much they are owed for the period from May 1 to Dec. 1.

They had been passing along higher wholesale prices, but last November a panic-stricken government ordered them to make the rollback to 4.3 cents effective from May.

The utilities’ total costs are difficult to predict, primarily because the government hasn’t yet decided who will be eligible for the rate freeze. But there’s little doubt they will add up to hundreds of millions of dollars.

The figure ought to temper the widespread sense of relief homeowners and small-business operators felt when Premier Ernie Eves pledged to freeze electricity rates until 2006. They had watched as prices, frozen for nearly a decade, suddenly soared. The $75 cheques that went out before Christmas, a down payment on what the industry calls "truing up," defused the anger and made the Premier look like a good guy.

Mr. Eves promised that his plan would be self-financing because Ontario Power Generation had earlier set up a $1-billion consumer-protection fund – in effect, a tax on electricity use. Beyond that, Mr. Eves said, taxpayers wouldn’t be on the hook for his rebate.

More and more, however, it looks like he was dead wrong.

"It’s absolutely incontrovertible that people are being bribed with their own money," said Tom Adams of the watchdog group Energy Probe.

Predictions about the electricity market are necessarily sketchy at this point. We can guess, however, because the average weighted price for electricity per kwh since May 1 has been 5.54 cents, more than 1.2 cents above the capped price.

The IMO says electricity supplies will be stretched thin again this summer if nuclear generation units at Pickering and Bruce are not returned to duty at high efficiency – and that’s by no means certain. Add in some hot weather and high-priced imported power, and wholesale prices will once again soar.

Bruce Sharp, a senior consultant at Aegent Energy Advisors Inc., projects an average weighted price for the first year of the market (to next May 1) of 5.48 cents.

Mr. Sharp believes it will cost the government about $300-million more than it has set aside with the OPG.

There are indications the government realizes the rebate is too rich for its blood because it has tightened up eligibility requirements, particularly as they might apply to large-volume users. At this point, the cap applies for certain only to about 40 per cent of the total market, and Mr. Adams believes that rebate could be covered by the OPG fund. But he thinks the government is scrambling to narrow "the scope of these handouts."

The great irony in all this is that the government wanted to overhaul the electricity market because it felt something had to be done about the $38-billion debt that Ontario Hydro had built up. The fact that it could be adding to this debt is too precious for words.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Ontario pulls plug on sale of Hydro One stake

Jeffrey Hodgson
Reuters
January 20, 2003

TORONTO — Ontario Premier Ernie Eves scrapped plans on Monday to sell a minority interest in Hydro One, the government-owned power grid, citing the need to protect energy consumers in Canada’s most populous province.

The decision hammered another nail in the coffin of the province’s experiment with electricity deregulation. A court decision last year scuttled plans to sell the entire transmission operation in what would have been Canada’s biggest initial public offering.

Eves said in a statement that his Conservative government had made an extensive search for a 49 percent minority partner, but that it was not prepared to relinquish control over key decisions affecting consumers. "We want to bring private-sector discipline to Hydro One, but not at the expense of protecting consumers," Eves said in the statement.

"Last November I announced a plan to lower your hydro (electricity) bill and we are sticking to that plan."

Ontario’s government announced in November it would freeze electricity prices and hand cash back to angry consumers whose costs had soared during five months of California-style deregulation,

Critics at the time warned the rate freeze, reminiscent of California’s attempt to cope with skyrocketing prices during its own deregulation, would likely kill the proposed sale of part of the publicly owned Hydro One electricity grid.

Brainchild of former premier

Deregulation, the brainchild of Eves’s predecessor, Mike Harris, was hugely unpopular in Ontario. Many consumers were angered when prices jumped more than 25 percent after the province opened the market up to competition on May 1.

In August, the Ontario government picked advisers to hunt down buyers for a minority stake in Hydro One, after a court quashed an earlier plan for a C$5.5 billion ($3.6 billion) initial public offering. The court had ruled the government did not have the authority to sell the system whole.

The premier’s press secretary, Derek Tupling, said Eves had made it clear that consumer protection, rather than ideology, was the top priority in the government’s handling of the issue.

"What the premier had said all along is we weren’t just going to sell it, just for the sake of selling it," Tupling told Reuters.

"There were some issues around control and decision-making processes that obviously the government wasn’t prepared to relinquish just for the sake of selling it. That is where the consumer-protection part of the announcement is."

The statement said the provincial budget continues to be balanced for a fourth consecutive year and the announcement has been factored into the government’s fiscal planning.

Industry watchdog Energy Probe said there should be little surprise at the announcement, as Eves had hinted at the move for several months. The group’s executive director, Tom Adams, said the value of the utility has plunged since the rate freeze decision in November.

"My interpretation of these events is that the premier has simply pulled the plug on the fire sale, having previously set the asset on fire," Adams told Reuters.

"The value to buyers kept going down and the numbers started to look unattractive to the government. They probably started to get embarrassed about what kind of a value-erosion was going to be demonstrated."

Election, budget issue

Adams said the potential buyers of a Hydro One stake included SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., Britain’s National Grid Transco, and two big pension funds: the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board.

An SNC-Lavalin spokeswoman said the firm had no comment on the Ontario government’s decision.

Opponents of the government’s energy policies cheered the decision but said they were wary the government could change its mind after an election, which many expect will happen this spring. Ontario NDP Leader Howard Hampton described the move as an "election dodge."

Ratings agencies also expressed concern at how the canceled sale would affect Ontario’s budget outlook. The government had said the sale of the minority stake could add about C$2 billion to its coffers.

"Without the sale of Hydro One, or without some revenues from a partial sale or whatever, it just creates a tremendous amount of pressure for this fiscal year and a significant challenge for them," said David Rubinoff, a senior analyst with Moody’s Investors Service in Toronto.

With additional reporting by Charles Grandmont in Montreal.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment

Ontario decides not to sell part of big hydroelectric utility

Bernard Simon
New York Times
January 20, 2003

All but putting an end to a deregulated electricity market in Canada’s industrial heartland, the government of Ontario said today that it would retain full ownership of Hydro One, the Toronto company that operates one of North America’s biggest transmission networks.

Less than a year ago, the government said that it intended to sell Hydro One through a public offering that would have been the largest in Canadian history, raising an estimated 5 billion Canadian dollars or $3.26 billion.

Environmental and consumer groups have lobbied against the sale and other efforts to open the electricity market to competition and private ownership. In addition to canceling the stock offering, the government ended competition in the retail electricity market last fall by capping prices for four years and reimbursing consumers for an electricity rate increase last summer.

After canceling the offering, the government indicated that it was seeking a "strategic partner" to own up to 49 percent of Hydro One. But the provincial premier, Ernie Eves, said today that the government had been unable to find a buyer willing to allow it to maintain control "over key decisions affecting consumers."

"We want to bring private-sector discipline to Hydro One," Mr. Eves said, "but not at the expense of protecting consumers." A government spokesman would not elaborate.

Thomas Adams, executive director of Energy Probe, a research group in Toronto, said that the decision reflected "short-term political thinking."

Mr. Adams said that prospective buyers wanted assurances that the company would be free of political interference, but that the government was not prepared to make such commitments.

"Every time the province freezes electricity prices," Mr. Adams said, "or says something rude about the regulator, the value goes down."

The government had hired BMO Nesbitt Burns and CIBC World Markets to advise it on the sale of a minority stake. According to news media reports, the British energy group National Grid Transco had recently walked away from the negotiations, leaving a group of Canadian pension funds as the most likely buyers. The company was expected to sell for 2 billion to 2.5 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion.

Hydro One operates an 18,000-mile transmission network, carrying more than 90 percent of Ontario’s electricity. It was formed in 1999 when the provincial government, pledging a more competitive market, broke up Ontario Hydro, a large not-for-profit utility that for decades had a monopoly on the electrical power supply.

Before the cancellation of its public offering, Hydro One had ambitious plans to expand into the United States. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Washington last year approved the utility’s plan to build a high-voltage underwater cable across Lake Erie, linking the Canadian and American power transmission grids.

But for the last nine months, Hydro One has endured executive upheaval. All but one of its 12 directors quit in June. The remaining director, Eleanor Clitheroe, the company’s chief executive, was fired by the new board shortly afterward.

Posted in Reforming Ontario's Electrical Generation Sector | Leave a comment