If we want to help the Third World, let’s promote nuclear power?

Paul Driessen, response by Tom Adams
Free Lance-Star
September 13, 2006

Re: “If we want to help the Third World, let’s promote nuclear power” (Published by the Free Lance-Star, Fredericksburg, Va, on Sept. 13, 2006 – original article appears below)

Nuclear power will light Africa’s darkness, says your author Paul Driessen, but his advice would make a bad situation worse.

Reactor designs similar to the “revolutionary” reactor announced in the article have been tried several times before in the developed world and several of those attempts were spectacular failures, including Fort Saint Vrain in Colorado. The fuel for the reactor your author promotes would require enriching uranium, the production of which could lead to weapons proliferation problems as we see now in Iran. On the subject of safety, pebble bed reactors contain a large inventory of graphite and other flammable materials.

Would giving the poor of Africa electricity solve their problems? That approach has been tried without success across Africa from Egypt to Ghana. Nuclear technologies, particularly untested ones, are not suited to meet the needs of Africa’s poor.

Tom Adams, Energy Probe
Toronto, Canada

If we want to help the Third World, let’s promote nuclear power

Nuclear to the rescue: Electricity is the key to a healthier, more prosperous Third World.

by Paul Driessen, the Free Lance-Star, September 13, 2006

“The only good thing about the good old days is that they’re gone.” My grandmother’s wisdom came from experience. As a teenager in late 19th-century Wisconsin, she had cleared tons of rocks from fields and hauled countless buckets of water on the family farm. If she had to select just one modern technology, she said, she’d choose running water. But electricity was a close second.

No wonder. Without electricity, modern life reverts to her childhood: no lights, refrigeration, heating, air conditioning, radio, television, computers, safe running water, or mechanized equipment for homes, schools, shops, hospitals, offices, and factories.

Incredibly, this is what life is still like every day for 2 billion people in developing countries. Viewed at night from outer space, Africa really is the Dark Continent: Only 10 percent of its 700 million people regularly have electricity.

While 75 percent of South Africa is now fully electrified, only 5 percent of Malawi, Mozambique, and other countries are so fortunate. Much of poor and rural Asia and Latin America faces a similar predicament.

Instead of rolling blackouts, neighborhoods have rolling power. “In the western part of my country, families get electricity maybe three hours every two weeks,” says Pastor Abdul Sesay, a Sierra Leone native who now resides in Maryland. “Eastern communities get it maybe once a month!”

Instead of turning on a light or stove, millions of women and children spend their days gathering wood, grass, and dung to burn in primitive hearths for cooking and heating. Instead of turning a faucet, they spend hours carrying water from distant lakes and rivers that are often contaminated with bacteria.

Pollution from their fires causes 4 million deaths a year from lung infections. Tainted water and spoiled food cause intestinal diseases that kill another 2 million annually.

The dearth of electricity also means minimal medical facilities, manufacturing and commerce – and impoverished countries forever dependent on foreign aid.

Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is thus a critical priority for developing nations. Hydroelectric projects offer one solution, coal-fired power plants another. They aren’t perfect ecologically, but neither are wind turbines, which require extensive acreage, kill birds, and provide inadequate amounts of intermittent, expensive electricity that cannot possibly sustain modern societies.

Now a revolutionary nuclear energy technology is being designed and built in South Africa, but with suppliers and partners in many other nations. The 165-megawatt Pebble Bed Modular Reactors are small and inexpensive enough to provide electrical power for emerging economies, individual cities or large industrial complexes. However, multiple units can be connected and operated from one control room, to meet the needs of large or growing communities.

Process heat from PBMRs can also be used directly to desalinate sea water, produce hydrogen from water, turn coal, oil shale, and tar sands into liquid petroleum, and power refineries, chemical plants and tertiary recovery operations at mature oil fields.

The fuel comes in the form of baseball-sized graphite balls, each containing sugar-grain-sized particles of uranium encapsulated in high-temperature graphite and ceramic. This makes them easier and safer to handle than conventional fuel rods, says Pretoria-based nuclear physicist Dr. Kelvin Kemm.

It also reduces waste disposal problems and the danger of nuclear weapons proliferation. Conventional fuel-rod assemblies are removed long before complete burn-up to avoid damage to their housings, but PBMR fuel balls are burnt to depletion.

Because they are cooled by helium, the modules can be situated anywhere, not just near bodies of water, and reactors cannot suffer meltdowns. If the chain reaction must be shut down in an emergency, the fuel’s residual decay heat dissipates slowly and naturally.

Since PBMRs can be built where needed, long, expensive power lines are unnecessary. Moreover, the simple design permits rapid construction (in about 24 months), and the plants don’t emit carbon dioxide.

PBMR technology could soon generate millions of jobs in research, design and construction industries – and millions in industries that will prosper from having plentiful low-cost heat and electricity. It will help save habitats that are now being chopped into firewood – and improve health and living standards for countless families.

“I met a guy living in the bush who got electricity and promptly started making wooden chairs,” Dr. Kemm told me. “Not garden stuff, but perfect Louis XIV chairs, because he could now use electric saws, drills, routers, and lathes.” His story will be repeated all over, as people gain access to electricity.

Not surprisingly, dozens of companies and countries are keenly interested in PBMR technology, and the first pilot plant will go online in 2011. But assorted special interest groups have lined up against it.

George Soros’ Open Society Foundation supports anti-nuclear organizations that oppose PBMR. Danish interests see it as undesirable competition for their wind-turbine businesses. Others assert that electricity “destroys” traditional cultures. “If there is going to be electricity,” says activist Gar Smith, it should be “decentralized, small and solar-powered.”

Poor people everywhere hope these patronizing attitudes will soon be replaced by a recognition that they have an inalienable right to take their place among the Earth’s healthy and prosperous people.

Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality and Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, and author of “Eco-Imperialism: Green power/Black death.”


This entry was posted in Nuclear Safety. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s