Parker Gallant: The forgotten directive

(September 12, 2011) Ontario’s Feed-in-Tariff (FIT) programs, designed to make Ontario a world leader in renewable energy, was implemented through two dozen or so government directives that gave well-heeled investors guaranteed sky-high returns on their investments. Most Ontarians, however, suffered in the gold rush that followed: not only did they lack the bankroll to invest; they had to indirectly finance the investors – many of them foreigners through surcharges on their power bills.

The government could have softened the blow to Ontarians and to the provincial economy through one more directive – it could have allowed OPG, the taxpayer-owned generating company, to participate in the gold rush.

From 2003 to the year-end in 2010, OPG’s earnings after payments in lieu of taxes (PIL) were $2,295 million (see Chart). OPG, for many years, has been required to set aside money for the decommissioning of their nuclear plants and for the disposal of nuclear waste and this “fund” as of March 31, 2011 contained $11,437 million.  Without the earnings from this fund since 2003 OPG’s earnings would have been miserable. The fund since 2002 has returned (on average) 6.5% which provided earning of $3,042 million or about $750 million more than OPG’s after tax earnings.

Ontario Power Generation (OPG)

1.                     Decommissioning Fund
2.                     After Payment in Lieu of taxes

The government directive would have allowed OPG to use the “Nuclear Fixed Asset removal and nuclear waste management funds” to invest in the solar sector.  If OPG had done that; earnings from the fund (based on the OPA’s calculations) would have easily doubled that $3 billion plus they earned from the fund to over $6 billion and the benefits would have accrued to all of the taxpayers rather than the elite monied crowd and those out of province investors.  At the same time the directive could have also required  purchases be made from Ontario solar panel manufacturers which would have led to the immediate creation of an industry scale that could actually compete on the world stage and generate local jobs.  That action might have also negated the World Trade Organization related actions that Japan, the US and the EU have undertaken against Canada on the Ontario mandated “content” levels as it would have been similar to the USA’s “buy America” policy that extends to federal or state owned entities.

Too many directives without any forethought have cost Ontario’s ratepayers billions while reducing the value of the taxpayer owned generating assets.

This entry was posted in Power Generation in Ontario, Renewables and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Parker Gallant: The forgotten directive

  1. Typical political motives in Financing “pie in the sky”ideas! What makes these politicians even “think” they have a handle on financial matters when most of them are just “bingo callers” meaning their only asset is a fair “Public Speaking” ability!
    Ask any experienced professional investor and ask them if they would invest in a Government sponsored portfolio and the unanimous answer is NO!
    We are in the hands of “fools guiding a rudderless ship in the seas of misery!”

  2. energy01 says:

    This is just one more example of how policy in Ontario government is not made to benefit the citizens. It is time to rid our province and government of crony capitalism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s