Wind power a viable, but unreliable source of energy in quake shattered Haiti

(Jan. 25, 2010) TORONTO – Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister is eyeing the potential for wind power along Haiti’s coastline as part of the effort to improve the earthquake ravaged country’s capacity for power production. Continue reading

Posted in Alternative Energy | Leave a comment

Dielectric Portal Technology – Whole Body Imager

(Jan. 25, 2010) The dielectric portal technology uses microwave energy to interrogate a passenger to detect the presence of metallic or nonmetallic objects. This scanner measures dielectric constant of a human body surface by means of the determination of the reflection coefficient of microwave radiation. Continue reading

Posted in Consumer Health | Leave a comment

Lawrence Solomon: UK Parliament announces 6th Climategate Inquiry

A UK parliamentary committee, the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Commons, on Friday announced an investigation into the Climategate emails, entitled “The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.” This is the sixth body known to have opened investigations into Climategate, and the first parliamentary body.

The terms of reference for the parliamentary inquiry, which will hold an oral evidence session March 10, relate to the integrity of the data produced by the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, the Independent Review that the university established to look into Climategate, and the extent to which CRU’s data has been integrated into the datasets of other international organizations. The parliamentary committee’s terms of reference are:

The Science and Technology Committee today announces an inquiry into the unauthorised publication of data, emails and documents relating to the work of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA). The Committee has agreed to examine and invite written submissions on three questions:

—What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research?

—Are the terms of reference and scope of the Independent Review announced on 3 December 2009 by UEA adequate?

—How independent are the other two international data sets?

The members of the Science and Technology Committee includes several climate change skeptics.

Apart from this committee’s inquiry, the other known investigations are being undertaken by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UK Met Office, East Anglia University in Norfolk in the UK, Penn State in the U.S., and the Norfolk police, with the assistance of Greater London’s Metropolitan Police.

Read the press release from the UK Science and Technology Committee

Posted in Climate Change, The Deniers | Leave a comment

Science and Technology Committee: The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Angli

Science and Technology Committee
http://www.parliament.uk
January 22, 2010

Science and Technology Committee: The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia

Terms of Reference

The Science and Technology Committee today announces an inquiry into the unauthorised publication of data, emails and documents relating to the work of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA). The Committee has agreed to examine and invite written submissions on three questions:

—What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research?

—Are the terms of reference and scope of the Independent Review announced on 3 December 2009 by UEA adequate (see below)?

—How independent are the other two international data sets?

The Committee intends to hold an oral evidence session in March 2010.

Background

On 1 December 2009 Phil Willis, Chairman of the Science and Technology Committee, wrote to Professor Edward Acton, Vice-Chancellor of UEA following the considerable press coverage of the data, emails and documents relating to the work of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU). The coverage alleged that data may have been manipulated or deleted in order to produce evidence on global warming. On 3 December the UEA announced an Independent Review into the allegations to be headed by Sir Muir Russell.

The Independent Review will:

1. Examine the hacked e-mail exchanges, other relevant e-mail exchanges and any other information held at CRU to determine whether there is any evidence of the manipulation or suppression of data which is at odds with acceptable scientific practice and may therefore call into question any of the research outcomes.

2. Review CRU’s policies and practices for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings, and their compliance or otherwise with best scientific practice.

3. Review CRU’s compliance or otherwise with the University’s policies and practices regarding requests under the Freedom of Information Act (‘the FOIA’) and the Environmental Information Regulations (‘the EIR’) for the release of data.

4. Review and make recommendations as to the appropriate management, governance and security structures for CRU and the security, integrity and release of the data it holds .

Submissions

The Committee invites written submissions from interested parties on the three questions set out above by noon on Wednesday 10 February:

Each submission should:

a)be no more than 3,000 words in length
b)be in Word format (no later than 2003) with as little use of colour or logos as possible
c)have numbered paragraphs
d)include a declaration of interests.

A copy of the submission should be sent by e-mail to scitechcom@parliament.uk and marked "Climatic Research Unit". An additional paper copy should be sent to:

The Clerk
Science and Technology Committee
House of Commons
7 Millbank
London SW1P 3JA

It would be helpful, for Data Protection purposes, if individuals submitting written evidence send their contact details separately in a covering letter. You should be aware that there may be circumstances in which the House of Commons will be required to communicate information to third parties on request, in order to comply with its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Please supply a postal address so a copy of the Committee’s report can be sent to you upon publication.

A guide for written submissions to Select Committees may be found on the parliamentary website at: http://www.parliament.uk/commons/selcom/witguide.htm

Please also note that:

—Material already published elsewhere should not form the basis of a submission, but may be referred to within a proposed memorandum, in which case a hard copy of the published work should be included.

—Memoranda submitted must be kept confidential until published by the Committee, unless publication by the person or organisation submitting it is specifically authorised.

—Once submitted, evidence is the property of the Committee. The Committee normally, though not always, chooses to make public the written evidence it receives, by publishing it on the internet (where it will be searchable), by printing it or by making it available through the Parliamentary Archives. If there is any information you believe to be sensitive you should highlight it and explain what harm you believe would result from its disclosure. The Committee will take this into account in deciding whether to publish or further disclose the evidence.

—Select Committees are unable to investigate individual cases.

Oral evidence

An evidence session will be announced in due course.

Posted in Climate Change | Leave a comment

Inside Ontario: Ontario Signs a Massive Green Energy Deal with Samsung

(Jan. 24, 2010) Ontario signed a $7-billion renewable energy deal with Samsung to build wind and solar energy clusters throughout the province. Continue reading

Posted in Renewables | Leave a comment

Inside Ontario: Ontario Signs a Massive Green Energy Deal with Samsung

Mark Brosens
TVO
January 24, 2010

Ontario signed a $7-billion renewable energy deal with Samsung to build wind and solar energy clusters throughout the province. By 2016, the project is expected to generate 2,500 megawatts of energy, or about 4 per cent of Ontario’s total energy consumption. The deal will create upwards of 16,000 new jobs, making Ontario the leader in Canada’s green energy equipment sector (Premier Dalton McGuinty wants to create 50,000 jobs in the renewable energy sector in the next 3 years).

However, Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak compared this deal to the eHealth scandal, claiming that the Samsung deal is a sole-sourced contract that likely violates Ontario’s procurement rules. Hudak called on Auditor General Jim McCarter to review the deal.

Meanwhile, the local renewable energy industry is complaining that Samsung will receive preferential rates for its energy and will get priority access to Ontario’s transmission system (which has limited capacity).

Some are challenging the economics of the Samsung deal. In the National Post, Lawrence Solomon notes that a proposed private wind farm project in Texas designed produce 4,000 megawatts of energy fell apart when financiers couldn’t be convinced the project made any business sense. Additionally, Solomon writes that in Spain every government-created green job cost two jobs elsewhere else in the economy.

Similarly, Randall Denley writes that the incentives given to Samsung in this deal shows that Ontario has become economically uncompetitive.

The Samsung deal is even controversial in the Ontario Liberal caucus. Some unnamed Liberal MPPs are complaining that they were not consulted on a deal that could raise residential energy prices and undermine local renewable energy suppliers.

Earlier this month on The Agenda, a panel debated whether green jobs can save the economy.

http://www.tvo.org/video/tvoplayersm.swf

Posted in Energy Probe News, Renewables | Leave a comment

Winds of change

Lawrence Solomon
Financial Post
January 23, 2010

In a signing ceremony Thursday for a $7-billion deal with Samsung to build wind and solar facilities, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said: “This means Ontario is officially the place to be for green energy manufacturing in North America.”

Quite right. Texas lost that title last week when billionaire T. Boone Pickens abandoned his plan to build 4000 MW of wind capacity in Texas — twice as much as the Samsung wind plan — when no financier could see how building the things made any financial sense. Other jurisdictions have also seen plans for wind vanish, along with plans for solar and other forms of renewable energy. Stock prices of most players in the wind industry, such as Broadwind Energy, GE’s supplier, are heading south.

But Ontario is different. Just as it built nuclear reactors into the 1990s after everyone else in North America bailed out to stop the bleeding — Ontario’s Darlington Nuclear complex was the last to be completed — Ontario has positioned itself to be the last gung-ho jurisdiction for so-called green technologies.

McGuinty estimates the Samsung deal will create 16,000 jobs, part of the 50,000 estimated jobs that his Green Energy Act aims to create. Here’s a better estimate, based on a study last year of Spain’s experience: For every green job that governments make happen, two jobs get lost elsewhere in the economy. By this reckoning, the Samsung deal will be costing the province 32,000 jobs while creating 16,000 jobs, for a net loss of 16,000 and the Green Energy Act will be costing 100,000 jobs while creating 50,000, a net loss of 50,000.

McGuinty is also wrong to expect Ontario, on the strength of its to-be-retrained workforce of former auto workers, to become a major exporter of windmills to the North American market. Michigan, with its own out-of-work auto workers, was also gung-ho on this plan — until the Chinese began to export wind technology to the U.S. China, now the world’s third-largest wind turbine manufacturer, is expected to soon become #1.

Not that China’s entrance into the U.S. wind business is likely to be any more of a winner than Ontario’s might have been. Thanks to new natural gas extraction technology, the U.S. is now awash in natural gas for electricity production, and is likely to remain so for decades. Natural gas is much less expensive and much more reliable than wind, blowing wind out of the running.

Not that wind, which can be economic in niche applications, ever was in the running as a major source of economically generated power. Wind power in North America costs several times as much as power produced from conventional sources. Its sole competitive advantage came from climate change fears that presaged cap and trade legislation in the U.S., which was expected to sideline coal and other CO2-intensive ways of producing power. That cap and trade legislation is now gone gone gone — after Copenhagen’s failure, the Climategate emails, and President Obama’s loss of grace, there is approximately zero chance that it will now come to pass. Meaning that meaningful U.S. curbs on CO2 are no longer in the offing.

Meaning that Canadian curbs on CO2 — seen as inevitable if we were to avoid trade sanctions following the U.S. legislation — are also dead. Now Canada has no trade sanctions to avoid, and no economic rationale to avoid CO2 emissions by switching to wind. So, too, among America’s other trading partners. Meaning that wind, as a large-scale commercial technology, is dead dead dead, even if its obituary has not made it to the official press.

McGuinty is among those who have yet to read the obit. Thinking that wind has a future, he has signed a sweetheart deal with the Samsung consortium that commits Ontario to paying Samsung more than twice the going rate for electricity and more still if it builds its wind and solar plants for export. He will give Samsung preferential access to the provincial grid, at the expense of Ontario’s domestic wind producers. And to quell opposition from communities that will object to having transmission corridors and windmills for neighbours, McGuinty has also promised to override local laws that give Ontarians a say in this green economy.

All of which is so crazy that it’s hard to see the deal coming to full fruition. McGuinty may not come to his senses but Samsung surely will once the demise of cap and trade legislation gets official standing — Samsung prudently gave itself the option to back out of the Ontario deal, just as Boone Pickens did in Texas when he saw which way the wind was blowing.

Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and Urban Renaissance Institute.

Posted in Energy Probe News, Renewables | Leave a comment

Winds of change

(Jan. 23, 2010) In a signing ceremony Thursday for a $7-billion deal with Samsung to build wind and solar facilities, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said: “This means Ontario is officially the place to be for green energy manufacturing in North America.” Continue reading

Posted in Renewables | Leave a comment

Whole Body Passive Millimeter Wave Imager

(Jan. 22, 2010) Passive millimeter wave technology is based on the principle that any object not in absolute zero temperature will emit electromagnetic energy at all wavelengths. Continue reading

Posted in Consumer Health | Leave a comment

Whole Body Active Millimeter Wave Imager

(Jan. 22, 2010) Active millimeter-wave imaging combines a source of millimeter wave energy with a detector and works as radar does, “illuminating” the area to be searched with millimeter waves and then imaging the reflected waves. This technology uses low energy, low intensity reflected x-rays to scan an object to generate an image. Continue reading

Posted in Consumer Health | Leave a comment