Is there an endless supply of oil?

Russ Vaughn
American Thinker
December 2, 2009

In doing some research on my modest energy investments, I came across a link that led me to a website called Energy Probe where I discovered a very interesting article entitled Endless Oil by Canadian environmentalist, Lawrence Solomon, which if true, could cause anti-fossil fuel Greens to turn hotly red.

According to Solomon, there is new evidence to support Russian and Ukranian geological scientists who are convinced that the time-honored and universally-taught belief that petroleum deposits are derived exclusively from long-dead plants and dinosaurs is about as scientifically sound as the concept of Anthropogenic Global Warming.

Rather, they say, hydrocarbons may be developed in an abiotic process by the high temperatures and huge pressures existing far below the earth’s 25 mile deep mantle, some 40 to 95 miles beneath our feet. This theory, first proposed in 1877 by Mendeleev, inventor of the periodic table (which should vouch for his scientific credentials) has been widely accepted by Russian/Ukranian earth scientists since the early 1950’s. According to this abiogenic theory, existing pools of petroleum are being continually replenished and new ones being created as newly-formed hydrocarbons migrate upward through cracks in the mantle.

While the concept has had little past support in the West, an article published in the July issue of Nature Geoscience, co-authored by the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution in Washington, the  Lomonosov State Academy of Fine Chemical Technology in Moscow and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, reports research that indicates this process is scientifically viable.

In other words, the world itself may be the world’s largest oil producer in an ongoing natural process. If these scientists are right, rather than running out of oil as the doomsayers loudly proclaim, we may have an endless supply.

Posted in Energy Probe News | 1 Comment

Lawrence Solomon: Climategate’s aftermath: Australia ditches cap and trade

Emboldened following the Climategate scandal, the Liberal opposition in Australia’s parliament threw out its pro-Kyoto leader yesterday and then today, under the leadership of global warming skeptic Tony Abbott, voted down the government’s plan to pass cap and trade legislation. The proposed legislation, intended to be a feather in the cap of Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd prior to his departure for climate change meetings in Copenhagen, failed by a vote of 41 to 33 in the Senate, Australia’s upper house.

Despite speculation that Rudd would call a snap election on the issue – a threat some expected him to take up because polls show him to be a favourite over his opposition – a cautious Rudd declined to risk an election against his new adversary, a conservative who pledges to oppose any tax on carbon.

The government’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, which faced fierce opposition from industry and agriculture, aimed to cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 25% from 2000 levels by 2020.

Posted in Climate Change, The Deniers | Leave a comment

A skeptical public

(Dec. 1, 2009) To kick off tonight’s Munk debate on climate change, the CBC invited Energy Probe’s Executive Director Lawrence Solomon and Dale Marshall, a climate change policy analyst for the David Suzuki Foundation, to answer questions from the public on the climate change debate. Continue reading

Posted in The Deniers | Leave a comment

Request to provide information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study

Energy Probe

December 1, 2009

Energy Probe Research Foundation
225 Brunswick Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5S 2M6
Phone: (416) 964-9223 Fax: (416) 964-8239

December 1, 2009

Freedom of Information Act Officer
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585

Re: Information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study (NSWS)

To Whom It May Concern:

Please provide information on the DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study (NSWS) performed by the School of Public Health of Johns Hopkins University under a contract with DOE. More specifically, I am requesting documents under the Freedom of Information Act created in the period between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1992.

I respectfully request a waiver or reduction of all costs associated with fulfilling this request. Disclosure of the requested information is likely to contribute “significantly” to the public understanding of government operations or activities. This request is made for scientific purposes and not for the commercial use of the requester, Energy Probe Research Foundation.

Please send information electronically or by mail to the provided email and mail addresses.

Thank you for your consideration of this request. I may be contacted by phone or email provided below to discuss any aspects of my request.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Solomon
Executive Director
Energy Probe Research Foundation
Phone: (416) 964-9223 ext 241
Email: larry.at.large@gmail.com

Posted in LNT | Leave a comment

A skeptical public

Energy Probe

December 1, 2009

To kick off tonight’s Munk debate on climate change, the CBC invited Energy Probe’s Executive Director Lawrence Solomon and Dale Marshall, a climate change policy analyst for the David Suzuki Foundation, to answer questions from the public on the climate change debate.

Surprisingly, many of the questions received by Mr. Solomon and Mr. Marshall were skeptical of the conventional wisdom that global warming is a serious threat to our society.

Tonight’s debate couldn’t come at a more interesting time for both supporters and skeptics of climate change. Last week a hacker stole vital climate change information from servers at the University of East Anglia in England. What the stolen information reportedly shows is that scientists who support the climate change theory appear to have doctored information and quashed dissent in order to support their ideas. Bloggers are now referring to the incident as “Climategate”.

To read the response to the questions, click here.

To read his most recent column, “Google’s climate ‘scholars’ ” in the Financial Post, click here.

Posted in Climate Change, Energy Probe News, The Deniers | Leave a comment

Request to provide information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study

(Dec. 1, 2009) Re: Information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study (NSWS) Continue reading

Posted in LNT | Leave a comment

Request to provide information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study

(Dec. 1, 2009) Information on DOE’s decision not to publish the 1991 Final Report of the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study (NSWS) Continue reading

Posted in LNT | Leave a comment

Climategate: The investigations begin

Financial Post

Penn State University has announced that it has begun an investigation of the work of Michael Mann, the director of its Earth System Science Center, following revelations contained in the Climategate documents that have emerged from East Anglia University in the UK. This decision follows close on the heels of a decision Saturday at East Anglia University to release climate change related data, a reversal of its previous stance. In addition, according to East Anglia’s press office, it will soon be announcing details of its own investigation.

The announcement of the chair of the inquiry and its terms of reference is expected to be made Monday.

Here is the full Penn State announcement:

University Reviewing Recent Reports on Climate Information

Professor Michael Mann is a highly regarded member of the Penn State faculty conducting research on climate change. Professor Mann’s research papers have been published in well respected peer-reviewed scientific journals. In November 2005, Representative Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) requested that the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) convene a panel of independent experts to investigate Professor Mann’s seminal 1999 reconstruction of the global surface temperature over the past 1,000 years. The resulting 2006 report of the NAS panel (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11676) concluded that Mann’s results were sound and has been subsequently supported by an array of evidence that includes additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions.

In recent days a lengthy file of emails has been made public. Some of the questions raised through those emails may have been addressed already by the NAS investigation but others may not have been considered. The University is looking into this matter further, following a well defined policy used in such cases. No public discussion of the matter will occur while the University is reviewing the concerns that have been raised.

Financial Post
LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com
Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and Urban Renaissance Institute and author of The Deniers: The world-renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution, and fraud.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Google’s climate ‘scholars’

(Nov. 27, 2009) Methods used to tabulate the number of experts who are skeptical of climate change leave something to be desired. Continue reading

Posted in The Deniers | Leave a comment

Hacked e-mails heat up climate-change debate

(Nov. 27, 2009) Christmas came early this year for Diane Katz and other Canadians at the forefront of the most polarized political fight on the planet. Continue reading

Posted in The Deniers | Leave a comment